Introduction
I am often asked to
review medical records, usually in conjunction with a comprehensive
psychological evaluation of a litigant, in a Worker’s Compensation,
Personal Injury or Disability claim in order to determine if a
litigant has a genuine mental disorder or if the litigant might be
exaggerating or faking a mental disorder. Occasionally I am asked
to conduct a medical records review only, without a face-to-face
evaluation of a litigant. The package of medical records provided to
me for review often consists primarily of treatment records
including both psychotherapy progress notes and
psychopharmacological treatment notes. Sometimes there are
independent psychological evaluation reports or other documents
provided to me in addition to treatment notes. I often find that
the medical records provided to me for review do not document the
full criteria of the assigned mental disorder as that disorder is
defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-IV). In this article I will discuss how an attorney or case
manager can differentiate between complete and inadequate
documentation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in a mental
health clinician’s report of psychological evaluation.
What Are The
Criteria of PTSD?
PTSD, like other
mental disorders, is a specific disease entity and is defined by
means of distinct criteria which can be found in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. There are four major
criteria that must be met in order to appropriately assign a
diagnosis of PTSD to an individual. These are: (A) that an
individual has been exposed to an extremely traumatic event and
responds with intense emotions such as fear or helplessness; (B) the
individual persistently re-experiences the trauma by means of
distressing memories, nightmares and distress upon exposure to
something that resembles the original trauma; (C) the individual
defensively avoids thoughts, activities and situations or people
that might arouse memories of the trauma and (D) the individual
shows symptoms of anxious arousal such as sleep or concentration
problems.
Some Examples of
Inadequate Documentation of PTSD
I often find that
psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers and other mental health
clinicians do not document the full criteria of PTSD in the written
evaluation report. Frequently, I have found that the clinician
merely reports the criteria of PTSD as they are described by the
litigant. For example, I have seen reports that purport to document
PTSD that state that the litigant meets the criteria for PTSD
because of the following: He was involved in a motor vehicle
accident. He has had nightmares. He avoids discussion of the MVA..
He can’t sleep since the MVA. Although these findings, on the
surface, may appear to document PTSD, they probably do not for the
following reasons: (1) No attempt was made by the evaluator to show
that the traumatic event meets the required severity criteria.
Examples of traumas that might be severe enough to be considered as
a possible cause of PTSD are listed in the DSM-IV. Not every
traumatic event meets the criteria for this disorder. In addition,
further investigation may reveal that the litigant has experienced
other traumas in his or her lifetime that are as severe or more
severe than the event alleged to be the cause of the psychological
symptoms; (2) Even if the traumatic event does meet the required
severity criterion, and there is no history of other severe traumas,
evaluators fail to document the nature of the litigant’s emotional
response to the traumatic event. I find that this required criterion
of PTSD is often overlooked by evaluators and is a good point on
which to cross-examine the evaluator and the litigant; (3) It is
important to show that the content of memories, nightmares and
flashbacks are relevant to the trauma under discussion. For the
mental health clinician to state only that the litigant has
“nightmares” is not enough. Cross-examination of the litigant or the
clinician might reveal that frequent nightmares contain content
relevant to an earlier trauma, such as having been abused as a
child, and that the nightmares do not contain content relevant to
the MVA; (4) Symptoms of PTSD can also be exhibited in other mental
disorders. For example, sleep problems and concentration problems
can also be seen in some types of depressive disorders and could
indicate a depressive disorder that might pre-exist or be otherwise
unrelated to the traumatic event and (5) DSM-IV clearly states that
malingering should be ruled out, when considering a diagnosis of
PTSD, in legal situations and when financial rewards may be
available. My experience is that it is rare that an assessment of
malingering is conducted and, when such an assessment is conducted,
it is often not done appropriate (that is, with psychological tests
designed for this purpose). Please refer to my article entitled “The
Importance of using Psychological Tests to Identify Faked,
Exaggerated or Malingered Symptoms in Litigation” for additional
discussion of the issue of assessing for malingering.
Conclusions
Even when common
sense suggests that a particular litigant might have a mental
disorder, such as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, that is caused by
an injury at work or a personal injury, my experience is that the
full criteria of PTSD are often not completely documented. There are
many reasons why clinicians might not adequately document PTSD in a
written report. Some possibilities are incomplete understanding of
the criteria for this disorder, lack of time to conduct a
comprehensive assessment or to prepare a report, a tendency to
“bond” with the patient and uncritically accept what the patient
describes about his or her symptoms and an unwillingness on the part
of a treating clinician to raise questions about possible
exaggeration or faking of psychological symptoms for fear this will
disrupt the treatment process. When PTSD is incompletely or poorly
documented, insurers and defense attorneys have the responsibility
to challenge this diagnosis.